psychology Deep Research
arrow_back Back to research list

Intentional Cranial Deformation among the Sarmatians

person Verified Contributor
calendar_today April 01, 2025

Intentional Cranial Deformation among the Sarmatians

Introduction

The Sarmatians were a confederation of Iranian-speaking nomadic tribes that dominated the Pontic-Caspian steppe (in modern Eastern Europe and southern Russia) from around the late Iron Age into the early medieval period (circa 4th century BC – 4th century AD). One striking custom among the late Sarmatians (particularly in the 2nd–4th centuries AD) was intentional cranial deformation – the practice of shaping an infant’s skull by binding or pressure, producing a dramatically elongated head shape in adulthood (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). This form of body modification is also known as artificial cranial deformation or head binding. The Sarmatians are notable for how widespread this practice became in their society and for the influence they had on spreading it to other populations in Europe (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals).

Cultural Significance

In Sarmatian culture, an elongated head appears to have been a marker of identity and group affiliation. Bioarchaeological studies indicate the custom was not limited by sex or clearly tied to social class – both men and women’s skulls show deformation at high rates, suggesting it was a community-wide tradition rather than a privilege of a particular caste (Intentional Artifiсial Cranial Deformation in the Late Sarmatian Population (Paleopathological Aspect)) (Intentional Artifiсial Cranial Deformation in the Late Sarmatian Population (Paleopathological Aspect)). Researchers interpret the deformed skull as a “constant symbol of intra-group solidarity and inter-group cultural differences,” essentially branding an individual as a Sarmatian and distinguishing them from neighboring peoples (Articles from journals). In other words, cranial shaping served as a permanent ethnic or cultural identifier. This aligns with patterns seen elsewhere during late antiquity – for example, in the 5th-century Migration Period, specific deformation styles likely signified membership in certain tribes or clans ( Cranial deformation and genetic diversity in three adolescent male individuals from the Great Migration Period from Osijek, eastern Croatia - PMC ) ( Cranial deformation and genetic diversity in three adolescent male individuals from the Great Migration Period from Osijek, eastern Croatia - PMC ). While aesthetics or spiritual beliefs (such as notions of beauty or supernatural protection) may have played a role, the primary significance among Sarmatians seems to have been to reinforce social identity within the group (Articles from journals) ( Cranial deformation and genetic diversity in three adolescent male individuals from the Great Migration Period from Osijek, eastern Croatia - PMC ).

Archaeological Evidence

Human remains provide abundant evidence of this practice among Sarmatians. Archaeologists have uncovered numerous artificially deformed crania in Sarmatian burial mounds (kurgans) across the Eurasian steppe. In late Sarmatian graves (2nd–4th century AD) from the Lower Volga and Don regions, well over half of the adult skulls are artificially deformed (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). In some cemeteries the incidence is astonishingly high – for example, about 70% of skulls from Lower Volga sites and roughly 50% from Lower Don sites show deliberate deformation (Articles from journals). In certain communities it was nearly universal: at the Pokrovka burial site near the Ural River, almost 100% of examined skulls were modified into an elongated shape (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). These figures underscore that cranial deformation was a common, normative practice among late Sarmatian populations.

Notably, the Sarmatian custom appears suddenly in the archaeological record of this region rather than gradually. The earliest instances in Sarmatian territory date to around the 1st century BC – for example, in Crimea the practice first appears in burials of the late Hellenistic period (circa late 2nd–1st century BC) (Articles from journals). It became widespread by the mid-2nd century AD, during the late Sarmatian period (Articles from journals). Because Sarmatian infants themselves are rarely found in these graves (children were often not buried in the monumental mounds), evidence comes from the deformed skulls of adults who underwent shaping in childhood (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). By analyzing these skulls, researchers can identify the telltale asymmetry or elongation that results from binding the head in infancy. The consistency of the deformation patterns within cemeteries suggests a deliberate, tradition-based practice rather than random natural variation or pathology.

Geographic Distribution

The practice of cranial modification among Sarmatians was concentrated in their homeland on the Eurasian steppes, but its influence spread widely. Within Sarmatian territories, deformed skulls have been found from the southern Ural region across the lower Volga and Don basins, into the Crimea and northern Black Sea coast (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). Key Sarmatian sites yielding such finds include burial mounds near the Esaulovsky Aksai river (Volgograd region), numerous kurgans along the Don River banks, and cemeteries in Kalmykia and Astrakhan regions, among others (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). Even some settlements of the Late Sarmatian era (not just nomadic burials) contain a minority of deformed skulls, for instance at the ancient city of Tanais on the Don, indicating the custom penetrated various communities (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals).

From these core areas, the Sarmatian (and related Alan) tribes helped transmit the custom westward. By the 3rd–4th century AD, elongated skulls begin appearing in Central Europe, coinciding with the migration of Sarmatian-Alan groups into the Roman frontier. Many scholars believe the Sarmatians/Alans were the carriers of this tradition into Europe (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). For example, deformed crania are found in 4th-century contexts in the Carpathian basin (Hungary and surrounding regions) where Sarmatian and Germanic populations interacted (Articles from journals). By the Hun period (4th–5th centuries AD), the practice had spread across Europe: contemporary writers even noted the bizarre head shapes of the Huns (Attila’s people) (Articles from journals). Archaeology confirms that some Germanic groups under Hunnic influence (such as the Gepids in 5th-century Hungary) adopted cranial deformation, presumably imitating or integrating with the steppe nomads (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). Thus, what began as a Sarmatian steppe tradition became a trans-European phenomenon during the Great Migration era. (Some authors debate whether the Huns independently introduced the practice or learned it from Sarmatian-Alans, but in either case the geographic diffusion is clearly tied to Eurasian nomads of this period (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals).)

Outside Europe, intentional head shaping was also practiced by Sarmatian-related groups in Central Asia. Sarmatians likely borrowed the idea from Central Asian tribes earlier in the Iron Age (Articles from journals). An older center of the custom has been identified in Central Asia and Kazakhstan, where cranial deformation can be traced back to at least the mid-1st millennium BC (Articles from journals). From roughly the 2nd century BC through the early medieval period, the practice was present across Western/Southern Siberia and Central Asia among nomadic cultures (e.g. the Kenkol culture and others) (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). The Sarmatians, positioned between Asia and Europe, were instrumental in linking these regions and timeframes, making cranial deformation a widespread Eurasian phenomenon by the early centuries AD.

Methods of Cranial Deformation

Intentional cranial deformation was achieved by manipulating the pliable skull of an infant. Because a baby’s cranial bones have not yet fused and can be gradually molded, Sarmatian parents would begin shaping a child’s head within weeks or even days after birth. This was accomplished by applying continuous pressure with some form of binding apparatus over the course of early childhood. Archaeological and ethnographic evidence from various cultures reveals two primary techniques:

In practice, the Sarmatians may have used a combination of devices: for instance, a soft cradle or cap and tight wrappings that were adjusted as the child grew. As noted in Mesoamerican records (by Spanish observers of the Maya), parents would sometimes bind an infant’s head as early as four or five days old, using boards, pads, or wrapped cloth, and continue for several years to lock in the shape (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online). By the time a child reached a few years of age, the skull bones hardened and the altered shape became permanent. The resulting appearance for Sarmatians was a markedly elongated skull vault, often with a receding forehead and a peaked top – a look that would immediately identify someone as belonging to the Sarmatian culture or a related group. Despite the extreme alteration, studies suggest that this cranial modification had little adverse effect on health: Sarmatian individuals with deformed skulls show no significant differences in overall health or brain pathology compared to those without deformation (Intentional Artifiсial Cranial Deformation in the Late Sarmatian Population (Paleopathological Aspect)) (Intentional Artifiсial Cranial Deformation in the Late Sarmatian Population (Paleopathological Aspect)), aside from a slightly higher incidence of minor jaw joint arthritis possibly due to skull shape changes (Intentional Artifiсial Cranial Deformation in the Late Sarmatian Population (Paleopathological Aspect)) (Intentional Artifiсial Cranial Deformation in the Late Sarmatian Population (Paleopathological Aspect)). In essence, the Sarmatians developed a method of head shaping that was compatible with normal life and caused no severe medical issues (Intentional Artifiсial Cranial Deformation in the Late Sarmatian Population (Paleopathological Aspect)) (Intentional Artifiсial Cranial Deformation in the Late Sarmatian Population (Paleopathological Aspect)).

Comparison with Similar Traditions in Other Cultures

Intentional cranial deformation is a cross-cultural phenomenon – many ancient societies, separated by time and geography, developed their own head-shaping traditions. The Sarmatians’ practice fits into this broader context, though the cultural meanings and methods varied. Some noteworthy examples include:

  • Other Eurasian Nomads (Huns, Alans, and Goths): As mentioned, the Sarmatians and their kin (the Alans) transmitted the custom to groups they encountered. The Huns of Central Asia and Europe in the 4th–5th centuries AD famously adopted (or already shared) the practice – Attila the Hun and his nobles were described as having artificially elongated heads (Articles from journals). As Hunnic power grew, some Germanic allies or subject tribes (e.g. the Gepids and Ostrogoths) began to shape their children’s skulls, possibly to emulate the prestigious look of the steppe warriors or to indicate mixed ancestry (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). By the 5th–6th century, elongated skulls turn up in cemeteries from Hungary to Bavaria and France, signifying how far this steppe custom spread in late antiquity (Articles from journals) (Articles from journals). In these European contexts, the practice may have been associated with nobility or elite status – for example, it has been suggested that among the Goths and early Bulgars, only people of high rank had access to cranial deformation, making it a mark of aristocracy (Palace of Omurtag - Wikipedia) (Paleoneurosurgical aspects of Proto-Bulgarian artificial skull ...). Over time, as these groups converted to Christianity and assimilated, the tradition died out in Europe (by early medieval times) except in some isolated pockets.

  • Ancient Mesoamerica (Maya and neighbors): The Maya civilization and other Mesoamerican cultures independently developed cranial deformation, with the earliest evidence in the region dating back to at least 1000 BC. Maya art frequently depicts gods and nobles with long, sloping foreheads, reflecting the aesthetic ideal of a shaped head (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online). For the Maya, head shaping was tied to ideas of beauty and cosmology – a high, elongated forehead was thought to resemble the maize god (with the head shaped like an ear of corn) and was considered very attractive (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online). This practice was widespread among the Maya elite and commoners alike; Spanish chronicles in the 16th century observed that it was still being done to infants in Maya communities (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online) (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online). The Maya primarily used a tabular method: pressing boards against an infant’s forehead (often while strapped to a cradle) to create a sharply slanting forehead and elongated skull back (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online). They sometimes placed the boards at different angles to achieve either an erect deformation (head flattened straight down in back, creating an upright forehead) or an oblique deformation (head flattened at an angle, causing a more diagonal slope) (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online). The cultural motivations were multifaceted – aside from beauty, some scholars suggest it had spiritual significance or served as a rite of passage ensuring the child’s soul remained with the body (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online) (Cranial Modification Among The Maya – Mesoamerican Studies Online). In any case, the Maya viewed a well-formed elongated head as a sign of proper upbringing and high status or nobility in society.

  • Andean South America (Paracas, Nazca, and Inca): In pre-Columbian South America, intentional head shaping was practiced by numerous groups, with some of the earliest known examples dating to ~2000–1000 BC in Peru. The Paracas culture of coastal Peru (c. 800–100 BC) produced some of the most extreme elongated skulls known, often in conjunction with complex burial rituals. They achieved a towering cranial shape by binding the head with ropes and possibly wooden splints, starting in infancy. Later Andean societies, including the Nazca and even the Incas, also engaged in cranial deformation, though Spanish records suggest the Inca elite eventually discouraged the practice to unify appearance in their empire. In the highland Andes, different ethnic groups used distinct styles as ethnic markers – for example, in one region of pre-Inca Peru, one group (the Collagua) elongated their heads in a cone shape while their neighbors (the Cavana) flattened theirs, each style serving to distinguish one group from the other in a visual manner. Like the Sarmatians, Andean peoples often regarded head shape as an indicator of lineage or group identity, and Spanish observers noted that certain shapes were associated with nobility or particular provinces.

  • Ancient Near East and Mediterranean: Cranial deformation was practiced in various Old World communities outside the steppe. The earliest documented cases come from the Near East – for instance, an 8th-century BC burial in Tepe Abdul Hosein, Iran yielded a small sample in which 8 out of 9 adult males had artificially modified skulls (Persistence of Ideologies and Norms during Colonization as Shown in the Practice of Cranial Modification: Three Examples | The Classic Journal). This suggests the knowledge of how to shape heads existed very early in the Iron Age Near East. Some Neolithic and Bronze Age cultures in the Middle East and Europe may have engaged in the practice as well. Archaeologists have reported cranial-modified skulls in areas like Neolithic Anatolia and the Levant, and even in some prehistoric European contexts (Persistence of Ideologies and Norms during Colonization as Shown in the Practice of Cranial Modification: Three Examples | The Classic Journal). For example, Hippocrates in the 5th century BC mentioned a people called the Macrocephali (“long-heads”) on the Black Sea coast who were said to bind infants’ heads, indicating the practice in the Caucasus region in antiquity. In the late Roman era, aside from the nomads, isolated cases of deformed skulls appear in places like Britain and Italy – possibly the result of Central Asian slaves or emigrants carrying the custom west. Overall, though less common in the classical Mediterranean world, the practice was known and remarked upon by ancient observers whenever they encountered peoples with such customs.

  • Other Notable Examples: Outside of the ancient contexts, head shaping persisted or reappeared in various parts of the world into more recent times. Certain North American indigenous nations (for instance, the Chinookan peoples of the Pacific Northwest and some tribes of the Southeast like the Choctaw) practiced head flattening well into the 18th–19th centuries, often as a mark of status or tribal identity (leading American explorers to call one group the “Flathead Indians,” though that was a misnomer). In Central Africa, the Mangbetu people of the Congo region were observed in the 19th and early 20th century binding their infants’ heads to produce an elongated shape, which was considered a sign of beauty and high status. Even in Europe, a form of cranial shaping known as the “Toulouse deformity” was documented in France up to the late 19th century, caused by traditional cradleboarding techniques that mothers used (Persistence of Ideologies and Norms during Colonization as Shown in the Practice of Cranial Modification: Three Examples | The Classic Journal). These examples illustrate that intentional cranial deformation has been a recurring and widespread human practice – truly global in distribution, found on every inhabited continent at various points in history (Persistence of Ideologies and Norms during Colonization as Shown in the Practice of Cranial Modification: Three Examples | The Classic Journal). The Sarmatians’ head-binding tradition is one chapter in this larger story of how humans have physically expressed cultural identity and aesthetics through body modification.

Conclusion

The Sarmatians practiced intentional cranial deformation as a meaningful cultural custom that helped bind their community together and signal their identity to others. Archaeological evidence across Sarmatian burial sites confirms that this practice was remarkably prevalent among them during the 2nd–4th centuries AD. Geographically, it spanned the Eurasian steppe heartlands of the Sarmatians and spread into Europe via migratory movements, influencing other groups like the Huns and Goths. The method relied on shaping infants’ skulls with binding apparatus (boards or cloth bands), which the Sarmatians likely did using primarily annular (bandaging) techniques to achieve a distinctive elongated head profile. In comparison to other ancient cultures – from Mesoamerican civilizations to Andean tribes and beyond – the Sarmatian approach to cranial deformation shared the common theme of using body modification to express cultural ideals (be it identity, beauty, or status). Each society had its own nuance in technique and meaning, but all attest to the human impulse to physically mold the body as a canvas of cultural expression. The legacy of the Sarmatians’ elongated skulls survives today in the archaeological record, providing insight into their social structure and interactions in the ancient world.

Sources:

label Tags

history Published Apr 01, 2025

article Further Research

Related research papers will appear here